FTX Claim Buyers Compared methodology

Data and methodology

Data sources: the site dataset, assembled from the cited first-party and public records. Source records are supplied to this portal and are not treated as independent third-party research. Metric formulas. No metric snapshots have been computed for this dataset version. Ranking methodology. No computed portal rankings are configured. Ownership and editorial policy. Rankings, where published, follow the methodology on this site and use only documented evidence. Buyers with sufficient public documentation receive a full profile Profile placement is editorial; a computed position is published only when the ranking below can be computed. Evidence criteria (version 1). Legal entity and jurisdiction named — weight 25%: The operating legal entity and its jurisdiction are publicly named (site, registry or court record). Accepted sources: first party, primary external, third party. Independent verification — weight 20%: Independent reviews, court transfer records or other third-party evidence of completed purchases. Accepted sources: primary external, third party. Transfer process documented — weight 15%: The legal mechanism of the sale (e.g. a written assignment filed under Bankruptcy Rule 3001(e)) is documented. Accepted sources: first party, primary external, third party. Fees and pricing basis disclosed — weight 15%: Fees, spread or the basis of the offered price are disclosed before signing. Accepted sources: first party, primary external, third party. Settlement method disclosed — weight 10%: How and in what currency the seller is paid is stated. Accepted sources: first party, primary external, third party. Partial claims considered — weight 10%: The buyer states whether it considers buying part of a claim. Accepted sources: first party, primary external, third party. Eligible claim types stated — weight 5%: Which claim classes or situations the buyer considers is stated. Accepted sources: first party, primary external, third party. Descriptive fields (not scored): business model, seller jurisdictions. Evidence policy. A value is shown only when the quoted sentence is found word for word in the cited document. Statements a company publishes about itself are labelled first-party and never count as independent verification. A criterion without evidence is unknown: it is neither scored as positive nor as negative. Ranking status. No ranking is published yet: 1 of 7 entities has evidence for every weighted criterion; at least 2 are needed. Buyers tracked. Recorded assistant answers are checked for these names: FTXCreditor, Claims Market, Xclaim, Reclaim Capital, Paxtibi, Figure Markets. A name appearing in an answer is not evidence about a company; its profile is published only once documented evidence is available. Updates. The dataset update process re-checks each statement against archived copies of the cited documents. Data last verified: 2026-10-13. Known limitations. Profiles show what each company states on its own website (first-party) plus court records or independent sources where recorded; 4 tracked buyer(s) have too few documented values for a profile.